• About Us
    • Mission Statement
    • Statutes
    • Board
    • Member
      • Corporate
      • Personal
    • Management
    • Become a Member
  • Our Programme
    • CEO Roundtables
    • Our Cooperations
    • Lectures
    • Stammtisch & Members’ talk
    • Events: panel discussions and webinars
    • Our Studies
  • Advocacy Programme
    • Mentoring Programme
    • Advocacy Seminars
    • Advocacy Webinars
    • Advocacy Network
    • Advocacy Voices
    • Rome Manifesto
      • The Manifesto
      • The Story behind the Manifesto
      • Partner Organisations
  • Events
    • Past events
  • DE
  • EN
  • DE
United Europe
United Europe
  • About Us
    • Mission Statement
    • Statutes
    • Board
    • Member
      • Corporate
      • Personal
    • Management
    • Become a Member
  • Our Programme
    • CEO Roundtables
    • Our Cooperations
    • Lectures
    • Stammtisch & Members’ talk
    • Events: panel discussions and webinars
    • Our Studies
  • Advocacy Programme
    • Mentoring Programme
    • Advocacy Seminars
    • Advocacy Webinars
    • Advocacy Network
    • Advocacy Voices
    • Rome Manifesto
      • The Manifesto
      • The Story behind the Manifesto
      • Partner Organisations
  • Events
    • Past events
  • DE
Join
  • News

Making Germany more strategic. A Council of Experts for Strategic Foresight is needed

  • September 27, 2018
Prof. James D. Bindenagel (Photo: CISG)

“For some time now, analysts have been criticizing the lack of strategy in German foreign and security policy. Germany is lacking coherence, vision, guidelines and departmental coordination while failing to set clear policy goals and to develop alternative options for political action,” writes Prof. James D. Bindenagel, former U.S. ambassador, member of United Europe e.V. and head of the Center for International Security and Governance at the Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn. Together with Philip A. Ackermann, he proposes to create a council of experts for strategic foresight (Sachverständigenrat für Strategische Vorausschau) to increase Germany’s ability to think strategically:

“Germany’s foreign policy stands at a crossroads. As a result of numerous crises and the disintegration of the international order, Germany’s traditional benchmarks for foreign and security policy are undergoing a fundamental change. As a result, Germany is compelled to re-evaluate its policies and strategic development. However, the dominant strategic culture in Germany is still passive, timid, and morally uncompromising. This culture is difficult to reconcile with the increasingly complex realities in foreign and security policy. In order to create a balance, it is crucial to promote a comprehensive public debate that is based on undogmatic analyses and prognoses. Strategic planning, foresight and gauging risks and threats entails the chance to create such a balance.

Although the German government has recognized in its most recent coalition agreement the need for strategic analysis, debate, and inter-ministerial coordination, the agreement solely strengthens existing structures within the ministries and think tanks linked to the government. A new, independent impulse to foster a public strategic debate could be the establishment of a council of experts for strategic foresight (Sachverständigenrat für strategische Vorausschau) similar to the existing German council of economic experts (Rat der Wirtschaftsweisen).”
For now, the entire text is only available in German and can be found here.

  • share 
  • tweet 
  • share 
  • share 
  • save 
  • share 
  • share 
  • email 

p >=1 && c == 0

Other News
  • Application Call for United Europe’s Advocacy Seminar on EU-Africa Relations
    • May 22, 2023
  • Review: United Europe’s Energy Security Summit in Vienna
    • November 16, 2022
  • Reconnecting European Cities with Nature: A proposal to combat climate change and foster urban resilience
    • August 22, 2023
„I hope for a Europe that nobody calls into question at a fundamental level. A Europe that has become so normal that it can be criticised“

Jens Spahn
Member of the Bundestag

More prominent opinions
Search
Trending Posts
  • Application Call for United Europe’s Advocacy Seminar on EU-Africa Relations
    • May 22, 2023
  • Review of United Europe’s Panel Discussion: The European Union prior to the election 2024: the situation, the issues, the people and the need for reform
    • May 16, 2023
  • Review Panel Discussion: “Is Europe in Africa driven by values or interests”?
    • July 11, 2023
  • Navigating Cross-Border NGO Donations among Member States
    • July 28, 2023
  • Panel Discussion: Is Europe in Africa driven by its values or interests?
    • June 26, 2023
  • About Us
    • Mission Statement
    • Statutes
    • Board
    • Member
    • Management
    • Become a Member
  • Our Programme
    • CEO Roundtables
    • Our Cooperations
    • Lectures
    • Stammtisch & Members’ talk
    • Events: panel discussions and webinars
    • Our Studies
  • Advocacy Programme
    • Mentoring Programme
    • Advocacy Seminars
    • Advocacy Webinars
    • Advocacy Network
    • Advocacy Voices
    • Rome Manifesto
  • Events
    • Past events
  • DE
  • Press
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Imprint
© United Europe e. V.

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
X